Back to EPSOready
Part 2 · Chapter 7 of 17

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union))

📖 Art. 19 TEU (Treaty on European Union) · Art. 251–281 TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) ❓ 2 Sample Questions
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is the EU's judiciary — it ensures that EU law is interpreted and applied uniformly across all member states. It sits in Luxembourg and is one of the most active international courts in the world.

1. Structure — Two Courts

Upper Court

Court of Justice

  • 27 Judges — one per member state
  • 11 Advocates-General — give independent legal opinions
  • Judges appointed for 6-year renewable terms, by common accord of member states
  • Sits in Grand Chamber (15 judges), Chambers of 5 or 3, or full Court
  • Handles: preliminary rulings, appeals from General Court, infringement proceedings, annulment actions by member states/institutions
Lower Court

General Court

  • 54 Judges (2 per member state since 2019)
  • No permanent Advocates-General
  • Also 6-year renewable terms
  • Sits in chambers of 3, 5, or Grand Chamber
  • Handles: direct actions by individuals and companies (annulment, damages), competition cases, staff cases (EU officials)
  • Decisions can be appealed to the Court of Justice (on points of law only)
Advocates-General: A unique feature of the CJEU — Advocates-General deliver impartial, non-binding Opinions to assist the Court. Their opinions are published and, while not binding, are highly influential and frequently followed by the Court.

2. Types of Proceedings

Art. 267 TFEU
Preliminary Ruling
Who: National courts → CJEU
A national court suspends its case and asks the CJEU how to interpret EU law (or whether an EU act is valid). The CJEU's ruling binds all courts across the EU. The most important procedure for EU legal uniformity.
Example: A French court asks the CJEU if a national employment law complies with an EU directive.
Art. 258–260 TFEU
Infringement Proceedings
Who: Commission (or member state) → CJEU
Commission takes a member state to Court for failing to comply with EU law. If the state still fails to comply after the first judgment, the CJEU can impose financial penalties (lump sum + daily fines).
Example: Commission v [Member State] for failing to transpose an environmental directive.
Art. 263 TFEU
Action for Annulment
Who: Member states, institutions, individuals (limited)
Challenges the legality of an EU act. If successful, the Court declares the act void. Individuals must show "direct and individual concern" (strict requirement — Plaumann test).
Example: A company challenges a Commission competition decision that fines it.
Art. 265 TFEU
Action for Failure to Act
Who: Member states, institutions, individuals
Challenges an EU institution for failing to act when legally required to do so. Requires first calling on the institution to act; if no action within 2 months, can bring the case.
Example: Parliament sues the Council for failing to adopt a transport measure.
Art. 268 + 340 TFEU
Action for Damages
Who: Individuals/companies → General Court
Seeks compensation for damage caused by EU institutions or their officials. Requirements: unlawful act, actual damage, direct causal link (Bergaderm conditions).
Example: A company claims damages after an illegal Commission regulation harmed its business.

3. The Preliminary Ruling — The Most Important Procedure

The preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU is the cornerstone of EU legal uniformity. It ensures that a German, French, Italian, or Romanian court all apply EU law in exactly the same way.

⚖ How the Preliminary Ruling Works
🏛️
A case is pending before a national court. A question of EU law arises (interpretation or validity).
The national court suspends its case and refers a question to the CJEU. Lower courts may refer; courts of last instance must refer (unless the answer is "acte clair" — already clear).
⚖️
The CJEU provides a ruling on the interpretation (or validity) of EU law.
📋
The case returns to the national court, which applies the CJEU's interpretation to resolve the dispute.
🌍
The ruling is binding on all courts in all member states — it becomes part of EU law uniformly applied everywhere.

4. Landmark Cases to Know

CaseYearPrinciple Established
Van Gend en Loos1963Direct effect — EU law creates rights individuals can invoke before national courts
Costa v ENEL1964Supremacy — EU law takes precedence over national law
Cassis de Dijon1979Mutual recognition principle — goods lawfully sold in one member state can be sold in another
Francovich1991State liability — member states must compensate individuals for damage caused by failure to implement EU law
Bosman1995Free movement of workers — UEFA transfer rules violated EU law

Key Terms

Preliminary ruling (Art. 267)
National court suspends case and asks CJEU to interpret EU law. Courts of last instance must refer. Ensures uniform application across all member states.
Infringement proceedings (Art. 258–260)
Commission takes member state to CJEU for non-compliance with EU law. Second judgment can impose financial penalties (lump sum + daily fine).
Action for annulment (Art. 263)
Challenge to legality of an EU act. If successful, the act is declared void. Individuals face the strict "Plaumann test" (direct and individual concern).
Advocate-General
Independent CJEU officer who delivers non-binding Opinions on cases before the Court. There are 11 Advocates-General, their opinions are highly influential.
Grand Chamber
The Court of Justice sitting in its most important formation — 15 judges. Used for cases of exceptional importance or at a member state's request.
Acte clair
The doctrine that a court of last instance need not refer a question to the CJEU if the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no reasonable doubt.

Sample Questions

2 sample questions · EPSO-style multiple choice

Q1. Under Article 267 TFEU, which courts are obliged (not just permitted) to refer questions to the CJEU?
  • A) All national courts
  • B) Only specialised courts
  • C) Courts of last instance (from whose decisions there is no further appeal)
  • D) Only Constitutional Courts
Q2. The General Court primarily handles:
  • A) Infringement proceedings against member states
  • B) Direct actions by individuals and companies, including competition cases
  • C) Preliminary rulings from national courts
  • D) Appeals from national supreme courts
Ready to Test Your Knowledge?
Start Practising on EPSOready →
Practice 1,500+ EPSO-style questions across all 5 test categories — including EU & Digital Knowledge, Verbal, Numerical, Abstract reasoning.